

Dr. McCoy was asked to present a brief review of the research on grade spans and grade configurations. Listed below are the notes Dr. McCoy distributed to the committee.
Research Findings
Single grade configuration –
Advantages (Reents, 2002)
§ Allows development of programs specific to the needs of that age group
§ Less influence by older students on younger students
§ Possible to increase course offerings
Disadvantages (Hopkins, 1997)
§ Distance and/or length of student travel may increase
§ May increase the number of school transitions
§ Fewer opportunities for interaction between age groups
Considerations - (Hopkins, 1997)
§ Cost and length of student travel
§ Possible decrease in parental involvement
§ The number of students at each grade level
§ Whether the neighborhood schools will continue to exist
§ The number of school transitions for students
§ Opportunities for interaction between age groups
§ Influence of older students on younger students
§ The building design -- is it suitable for only a few or for several grade levels?
Bob Monroe gave a brief review of school districts similar in size and quality to our district concerning their grade configurations. Grade configurations are as follows:
§ PK-3
§ PK-5
§ K-3
§ K-5
§ K-8
§ 4-5
§ 6-8
§ 9-12
Mr. Meadows then gave a grade grouping report as requested by the committee. The two scenarios requested to be looked at were:
|
Scenario 1 |
Scenario 2 |
|
Pre k |
Pre K |
|
K-1 |
K-2 |
|
2-3 |
3-5 |
|
4-6 |
6 |